Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:13

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Google brings new Gemini features to Chromebooks, debuts first on-device AI - Ars Technica
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
At 53, Jennie Garth Poses in Her First-Ever Underwear Campaign - instyle.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How can I be the smartest human on Earth?
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How do you feel about Donald Trump signing an executive order that says there are only two genders?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Measles Exposure Prompts Health Warning In Bay Area - Patch
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sega Throws Shade At Mario Kart While Showing Off Sonic Racing: Crossworlds - Kotaku
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: